# How to engage low-level students?

I'm a recent graduate in my first year of teaching. I teach secondary students, and I have found that some low-level students are not listening in class. They seem to have given up and stopped trying. I feel it's hard to make a difference or help them because they don't seem to care. How can I engage these students?

• When you say you are a graduate teacher do you mean you teach post-graduate (masters) level university courses? If that's the case, unless you are losing a significant (50+%) part of the class the problem is your student's and not yours. At the graduate level IMO you really should be teaching to the average or above average, the students are there to learn not to be coddled. I'm assuming this is the US too in much of Europe this applies at least from undergrad and for the better schools from high school.
– DRF
Mar 21 '17 at 10:23
• @DRF I meant this is my first year teaching, I teach secondary students. Mar 21 '17 at 10:28
• I think that one thing that would be helpful is to edit your post to have one concrete example of a class and giving up behavior. This one is so vague as to be impossible to give assistance on. Mar 21 '17 at 12:10
• Welcome to the site. If you edit the question you may get better answers. Clarify that you are a recent graduate who is teaching secondary students (not a graduate teacher). Also let us know what you've tried and how wide a gap there is in the class. Mar 21 '17 at 13:03
• To piggyback on Amy B's comment, it would help to know what class you're teaching, and what levels the students are at. For example, if you're teaching HS algebra and you've got some students who can't add fractions, other students who can do fractional arithmetic just fine but can't handle the concept that $x$ can stand for anything, and a small number of students who are breezing through and really should be in a higher class, that would be helpful information to have. You can edit your question to add this info. Mar 21 '17 at 14:18

There isn't enough information to answer the question, but I'll speculate, based on what often happens in the world of math education.

People who enjoy & teach math are often shell-shocked at how many people consider math to be a meaningless, tear-filled, horrible subject in which effort is pointless. My guess is that most students have given up on trying because 287 adults before you have told them to try harder, then given them rote or inappropriately difficult work... in which trying doesn't make a difference. See my recent post on fractions for examples of how hard work combines with rote gibberish to demoralize and confuse.

I suspect many of your students view you as the 288th adult who's giving them more rote gibberish and empty pep talks. Some likely signs of this: your lessons are very heavy on symbols and students (rightly?) don't believe you when you say they should pay attention and try harder.

Their response: The bare minimum effort to: (a) get you off their backs and (b) avoid summer school or repeating the course.

Consider doing gentle but probing "math biography" interviews with some of your students. Tell them you need their input to become a better teacher and want to begin by understanding when they stopped trying. Ask them when math became a painful subject for them. In kindergarten, math is for many children the favorite academic subject; among the general population, about 37% of people specifically use the word "hate" to describe how they feel about math. [Many others use other negative words to describe their feelings.]

Expect a lot of stories such as:

• "I loved math until grade 4. Then my teacher didn't really teach us division or fractions and never tested us on anything. Sometimes we'd go weeks at a time without a math class, months without a test. I've been terribly confused in most math classes since then. I noticed that studying really hard didn't help, so I just don't try hard any more because it's not fun." Note that this is likely true: given terrible confusion regarding grade-4-level division, does it matter if you study really hard to master proportional reasoning and ratios? Of course not. Hard work didn't matter then even though adults falsely told them it would. Why are you different from those adults?
• "My teacher made the class do all these timed exercises. I was the slowest one in the class no matter how hard I tried and that's when I realized I was stupid." Notice that maybe the student just needed to learn, say, how $$6+6=\_\_\_$$ and $$6+7=\_\_\_$$ are related, then they could have stopped counting by ones to do all calculations. But if you don't know such relationships, then, well, math = counting by ones, which is slow and makes people feel stupid. It's a hopelessly weak foundation for future math. Are you trying to build on their hopelessly weak foundations?
• "The teacher would make me come to the front of the class and tell me to do math I couldn't do and that was humiliating. I hate math. So just tell me how to pass this class so I don't have to go to summer school." How often do your students feel great about what they've learned and accomplished in your class?
• "Math is just all these steps. I just memorize those steps. I'm the memorizing type. I'm not interested in understanding because I don't think there is anything to understand. Just tell me the steps and I'll do them." Are you sure you're really testing for understanding? Are you really convincing your students that math is understandable?
• Now that I'm old enough, I think I can figure out that a satisfactory answer to the question how are "6 + 6 = ___ and 6 + 7 = ___ related?" is "I guess you're talking about the two problems themselves, rather than the numbers that are the answers to the problems. Actually the pair of questions is related to the pair of answers. The two questions have the property that they differ by 1 only in the second operand and the two answers have the property that they differ by 1." I gained that ability eventually and probably a lot else school was trying to teach. If so, there was no need to waste Dec 2 '19 at 1:36
• material on trying to push me to learn abstract stuff like how to explain things earlier. Maybe not everyone eventually gains that ability to a high enough extent but still I think it's better not to push it on those students. They start struggling and adopting a linear thinking approach. When the teacher teaches what takes longer to teach with an understanding than the amount of time spent in school, the students probably end up struggling and learning even less. Dec 2 '19 at 1:39
• The share of students who cannot relate "6+6=___" to "6+7=___", when presented visually and/or with manipulatives, is miniscule. Many students will lack the words to tell you how they're related, but they can typically show you with counters or apply the same concept to 25+25=50, 25+26=___, 25+24=___, etc. Dec 3 '19 at 4:40

In my opinion a very important tool for the teacher is a lesson plan for every lesson. I was a math tutor in a math center for 8 years and I conducted multiple worshops in a classroom setting with over 20 students at a time. Techniques that worked for me were: inviting students to ask questions during the lesson , polite responses to questions , eye contact with the students , doing a worked out example on the board and then writing a similar problem beside it and asking the students to solve it at their desk while I walked around and looked at their work and gave helpful hints if the student seemed stuck. Also I would have students work in groups of 4 or 5 so they could exchange ideas with their peers. You have to mix it up a little so some students don't get bored.

Hope this helps :)

The answer isn't the same for every educator or every group (or every combination thereof). I find that the key is to consider myself constantly trying to find this answer. In other words, from day 1 to the final second of your time with these students, you are trying to find the "holy grail," so to speak. ...or at least get closer...

In other words, you are trying to reach every student, every small group of students (as they exist), and the larger group (class as a whole). Therefore, I try to connect with each individual and each group as authentically as possible (a little fake-it-til-you-make-it can help here) If it feels forced, it is... but don't give up.

If a strict lesson plan is authentic to you, then do that, but make sure you PAY ATTENTION TO EXACTLY WHO YOU ARE TEACHING. Connect with them.

As you manage to understand them better, you may also find ways to articulate the lessons differently, ultimately framing them in a more relatable way. A very simple example: you find a certain cross-section of students are soccer players, so all of your momentum lessons (physics application here!) have to do with soccer balls. Just be careful you don't get too hokey ;-) ...you don't want the students rolling their eyes too hard. But thy really do appreciate the effort if you're being sincere and totally authentic.