Sources: 1 by Tim Gowers. 2 by Marcus du Sautoy. 3 by Richard Muller.

This question assumes that pre-calculus, probability & statistics ought still be taught in high school, and involves only those who won't need university-level math. Can studying Logic also teach you the non-quantitative benefits cited below (e.g. thinking, pattern searching, problem solving)? If not, why are they exclusive to studying math?

$\Large{\color{limegreen}{{[1.]}}}$ Mathematics should be a tool for increasing one’s thinking power but for many children it is just a set of rather pointless rules for manipulating symbols.
It is therefore good for the health of a country if its population has high standards of mathematical literacy: without it, people are swayed by incorrect arguments, make bad decisions and are happy to vote for politicians who make bad decisions on their behalf.

$\Large{\color{limegreen}{{[2.]}}}$ But why should maths be privileged above learning a foreign language or history? Does everyone need to know what a cosine is if the UK is to have a brighter future? Does the success of our economy depend on every citizen feeling confident factorising a quadratic equation? It may come as a surprise to you that I don’t think so, but I’m still a big believer in teaching maths to 18. What will be important is making sure that the maths we expose students to is both relevant to their future and the future of our country.

What many are not aware of is that maths is so much more than the technical cogs that currently form the backbone of the curriculum. It is about pattern searching, extended analytical and logical thinking, problem solving. I am just embarking on making a new programme for the BBC about the beauty of algorithms. Many of the best algorithms contain no numbers or equations at all, but are full of mathematical thinking. And it is those algorithms that are creating efficient approaches to a whole range of business solutions, from the distribution of goods from supermarket warehouses to decisions about flight schedules at Heathrow airport.


What about those humanities students or creative artists or vocational students who might argue that they will never need more maths? I believe that even these students, if exposed to the right curriculum, will recognise the benefits of more maths. I am doing an event with the Booker-winning novelist Ben Okri at the Hay festival next month about the connections between mathematical proof and literary narrative. As a novelist, Okri is the first to recognise the importance of a logically consistent narrative to the success of a novel – but also the wonderful benefit that a mathematical sensitivity to pattern and structure can give novelists as they create a narrative arch. From musical composition to carpentry, from street art to journalism, a mathematical mindset potentially gives one an edge.

This Reddit comment affirms that math is logic:

And mathematics is philosophy, it's just a lot less "wordy" and rather brought to the meta level. I mean just look how complicated you have to explain a valid and a sound argument and how nicely you can calculate with them in the boolean framework.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I don't understand the question. You say that math through pre-calc is still taught. And that the students won't need uni math (which would be calculus next, right?) But then say why not logic instead of math. But you just said they DON'T NEED any uni math (like an English major or something). So, what's even the question? $\endgroup$
    – guest
    Dec 18 '17 at 23:56
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielR.Collins I didn't intend this as a rant. I modified the title if this were msileading? $\endgroup$
    – NNOX Apps
    Dec 19 '17 at 0:34
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ -1, I'm really confused by the question; it honestly looks to me like it was posted just to advertise the Canada proposal(???). Severely paring back the quotes and talking about which part of the quotes you are interested in would greatly improve the question. $\endgroup$
    – Chris Cunningham
    Dec 19 '17 at 3:18
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ Logic is math. $\endgroup$
    – shoover
    Dec 19 '17 at 16:50
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This is a reasonable question: "Can studying Logic also teach you the non-quantitative benefits cited below (e.g. thinking, pattern searching, problem solving)? If not, why are they exclusive to studying math?" $\endgroup$
    – Tommi
    Dec 19 '17 at 18:44

Ah...I understand a little better now!

I would say, sure. But I would also include business analysis, literary analysis, qualitative analysis (chemistry), engineering troubleshooting, and six sigma type stuff as excellent places to get problem solving skills. In some ways BETTER than math.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.