I have found very little online that compares & critiques the MVP vs traditional curricula. Any suggestions & pointers would be welcomed.
The MVP is an implementation of Common Core Standards in the USA aimed at the K-12 grade levels.
I have one child who followed fairly standard curriculum which was challenging from a mathematics perspective and provided a solid basis.
I have another child, two years younger who has been following the MVP. Frankly, I have nothing good to say about it. I am surprised to find so little about it online. I fear that my second child's interest in mathematics has been irreparably damaged and the skills taught insufficient in comparison to their older sibling.