# Use of Lockhart's *Measurement* in a course?

I greatly admire Paul Lockhart's Measurement (Harvard Press). Many of you know him through A Mathematician's Lament. One review of Measurement said,

“Here Lockhart offers the positive side of the math education story by showing us how math should be done. Measurement offers a permanent solution to math phobia by introducing us to mathematics as an artful way of thinking and living.”

But I do not see a way to integrate this into a conventional mathematics course (say, for undergraduates).

Q. Can anyone see a way to use Lockhart's Measurement in mathematics education, either in a conventional course, or as a supplement, or for guided independent study?

Added. One could imagine Part One supplementing a first course in Geometry, and Part Two supplementing Calculus I. But the style is so unique that I can't decide if it would be better for these sections to proceed or to follow geometry/calculus. But really the true thrust of the book is to understand what it means to pursue mathematics.

I like this quote (where "we" = "we mathematicians"):

We're always working at the edge of the unknown, and we're always stuck.

A few SE citations of Measurement:

• This sounds interesting. Enough so that perhaps you can give a few examples after your citations of some specific topics 'covered' (I assume, from the Lament, that there isn't coverage in the usual sense)? For those of us who haven't read Measurement, this question could easily become an insider knowledge game if the answers also assume one has read it. Not that you intended that, of course! Just trying to be proactive - hope people have ideas! May 3, 2019 at 3:36
• @kcrisman: Good point. I've pasted in the table of contents, but you are right: there is not coverage in the usual sense. May 3, 2019 at 11:32
• This is a wildly insufficient response, but since relatively little has been posted thus far: I lent a copy of this book to a student who was looking for extra math reading. She returned it after reading a bit and finding it not to be engaging. (FWIW: I have taught a lesson using the Lament before; see part two here (pdf).) Anyway: If Measurement is to be used in a course, then my $n=1$ experience is that more structure than offering it as an independent reading will be necessary. Sorry I don't have more! May 4, 2019 at 16:47
• (1) Frankly, the very first sentence of the Lament says enough for me to completely discard it: "A musician wakes from a terrible nightmare. In his dream he finds himself in a society where music education has been made mandatory." One can see where he leads from a mile away. No, I do not agree with the analogy. The importance of being able to compare amounts, to do basic arithmetic, to calculate percents, to figure out whether one can make it on the remaining gas without filling up, all these small things happen every day. May 8, 2019 at 18:36
• @RustyCore: I myself do not entirely agree with the MAA review. I certainly don't think it could serve as a textbook. I just thought I would include a reviewer's opinion on the question I posed. I've read both Polya and Lockhart. Both are valuable, but quite different. May 9, 2019 at 17:52