A good answer to this question is one that (is correct, and) she finds convincing.
As kids are growing up and making sense of the world around them, experimentation is often one of their key sources of truth. Perhaps, experimentation can also serve as a reliable and effective gateway to the abstract world of mathematical truths!
Here's one possible roadmap that leads convincingly to arithmetical truths.
Experiment with an Object: Take $2$ blocks, add $6$ blocks. Count the total number of blocks to discover that the result is $8$ blocks. Therefore, $(2 \mbox{ blocks}) + (6 \mbox{ blocks}) = (8 \mbox{ blocks})$.
Discover that these results apply to all Other Objects: Experiment to discover that this rule applies to other objects such as apples, almonds, chairs, tables, toys, candy and anything else you can think of. Perhaps she would be willing to take the leap with you to agree that this would apply to other things that she has not yet experimented with, such as ships, planets and whales. Therefore, $(2 \mbox{ things}) + (6 \mbox{ things}) = (8 \mbox{ things})$.
General result: Since these results are valid irrespective of the object or thing being added, it is therefore acceptable (and more efficient) to write our experimental result concisely as: $2+6 = 8$ without reference to any object in particular.
Soon we point out that, in particular, these rules also apply to fingers (just like any other object), which are always at hand(!) so we can use them no matter what it is that we are in fact trying to add.
The key feature of the approach just outlined is that the act of writing $2+6 = 8$ is a symbolic recording (by pencil on paper, or chalk on board) of an experimental truth that we have discovered by exploring the world around us. The question of logically or abstractly proving it, therefore, does not arise.
When we arrive at the question, "what is $4+4$?", we must now resort to experimenting with our fingers (or any other object) to discover the result of this addition. Having discovered the result, we can record it symbolically as $4+4 = 8$.
Of course, we can get creative with our experiments. For example, to count the number of dots below,
: : : :
we can count them as
: $+$ : : :
or as
: : $+$ : :
This provides an intuitive justification that $2+6$ and $4+4$ are really just two different ways of visualizing $8$.
Also, I can't help pointing out that the following is a staggering gap in her present education:
But she has not learnt the Peano Axioms at this age.
I hope you will remedy it at the earliest! ;)