Students using l'Hôpital's Rule on the terms of a series, instead of the Limit Comparison Test

I realize this is a very specific question, but it is something I have noticed over the last few semesters teaching sequences and series in Calculus 2 to undergraduates.

The purpose of the Limit Comparison Test is to take an intuition, such as $$\text{The series }\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{5\sqrt{n}-2}{n+1}\text{ ''behaves like'' }\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\text{ , which we know is divergent}$$ and make it more rigorous. I take great care in explaining how the limit $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{(5\sqrt{n}-2)/(n+1)}{1/\sqrt{n}} = \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{5n-2\sqrt{n}}{n+1} = \lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\frac{5n}{n+1} - \frac{2\sqrt{n}}{n+1}\right) = 5-0 = 5$$ yielding a finite, nonzero result shows that the terms of the two series approach 0 at rates that are approaching constant multiples of each other, thereby showing that their convergent/divergent behavior is identical. We go through several examples, each time saying, "Well, it looks like this series is 'kinda like' $\sum 1/n^2$, so let's use Limit Comparison to test it!"

This is how the test is presented in every calculus textbook I have seen, and how I have taught it in the past. I try to give more of an explanation as to how the test works, but I definitely point out how it needs to be used to test our intuitions.

Perennially, though, I notice at least a few (and sometimes shockingly many) students "inventing" their own form of the Limit Comparison test and using it on homework and exams. It goes something like this: $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{5\sqrt{n}-2}{n+1} = \text{(by l'Hôpital)} \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{5/(2\sqrt{n})}{1} = \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac52 \cdot\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \text{ and we know \sum \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} diverges}$$

Quite often, this method is not even presented so nicely, showing something more like this: $$\frac{5\sqrt{n}-2}{n+1} \rightarrow \frac{5/(2\sqrt{n})}{1}\rightarrow \frac52 \cdot\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \rightarrow \text{diverges}$$

1. Have you also noticed this before? How did you react?
2. Why does this occur? Are there texts/courses/teachers out there who teach this as a valid method? If not, are students tapping into some common ideas that make them come up with this (seemingly) independently every semester?
3. (Whether or not this is currently being taught) are there good reasons to do so?
4. If this is not a good approach to use, how can we show this to students? It does seem to be "effective" somehow, so how might we dissuade them? Should we show them outright and say, "Don't do this"? Or do we handle it only with those who re-invent this particular wheel?
• I don't think I've seen that. I mostly remember invention of the $a_n \rightarrow 0$ thus $\sum a_n$ converges rule. Always popular, usually wrong. Apr 19 '14 at 20:40
• @james cook: Yes, I notice that quite often, too. But that's a different issue. Apr 19 '14 at 20:42
• Seems like a reasonable method, right? I mean, rather than following an intuition that the series behaves like some other series, you can just evaluate the limit and conclude that it diverges. Apr 19 '14 at 21:51
• Yes, it's very reasonable. So is it taught this way elsewhere, and I'm just unaware? Apr 19 '14 at 21:53
• Looks fine to me. They are using a known result (l'Hôpital) to compute a limit they want. Apr 20 '14 at 3:29