You want to host a seminar where students will present either

  • a chapter from a book, or
  • a (part of a) scientific article.

What is the best way (=such that the students learn as much as possible from the seminar without increasing the efford of the adviser too much) to schedule the seminar? Should there be one presentation per week or should there only a few meetings with a lot of presentations per day? Why? And does it depend on the type of seminar?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Following the discusion on undergraduate vs college by analogy, I changed this sole instance of university to graduate-education (on the grounds that such seminars are typically for "graduate students" at least in a rough sense or more so than for undegraduate ones.) $\endgroup$
    – quid
    Commented Mar 19, 2014 at 21:40

2 Answers 2


Personally, I feel I take away a lot more from x isolated talk than from x talks at one conference day.

For the seminar, especially if it is a sequence of talks from one book or article where one "works through" something together I would especially recommend several meetings.

In the best case, students will try to actively digest the talks afterwards and/or prepare for the next one. It is then also easier to address questions that might come up yet cannot be answered on the spot, by reporting them to the beinning of the next session.

Now, in the worst case, students do not care at all and forget everything from one meeting to the next. But, first, this is pessimistic a view and second one can work against this by briefly coming back to last weeks talk at the beginning of the session.

However, there are also considerations against weekly meetings:

Sometimes attendance can be a practical issue. Either since students simply do not show-up sometimes if it is weekly, or since it might be difficult for them to do so (in which case one might try to help them voa a different form of organizing it).

If the presentations are by and large independent there might be reasons for fewer longer session, perhaps even a full day, and to seomhow give it a mini-coferrence feeling. Yet, also here, there are practical considerations, such as: Is finding a room for a full day perhaps a problem? Can students be available for a full day?

In brief, in some cases like "working through" a book I would strongly favor weekly meetings; in the other cases, I'd say it depends mainly on local, practical circumstances.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ After a day of conference you are dead tired. That argues against too long a stretch at a time. $\endgroup$
    – vonbrand
    Commented Mar 19, 2014 at 2:02

To relieve part of the burden, ask the students themselves to participate actively (with real responsibilities) in the organization. Lighten up/complement the seminar with some invited speakers. Depending on the breadth and depth, and the number of presentations, it miight need to be programmed beforehand.

Leave plenty of time between presentations, for discussion and relaxing before the next one. In conferences they are interested in cramming as many presentations as possible into the available time (and, cross your heart, you don't go to conferences to see the presentations, but to talk informally with the authors).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.