63
votes
Why is it possible to teach real numbers before even rigorously defining them?
Expansion of mathematical knowledge does not unfold in Bourbaki progression. This is true at the level of both societal and individual knowledge. Just as the invention and significant applications of ...
- 7,585
62
votes
Why would you teach Calculus before teaching Real Analysis?
You may as well ask: Why teach elementary school children how to perform whole-number arithmetic without teaching them the Peano axioms first? Why teach high-school Algebra without starting with the ...
- 16.3k
44
votes
Why is it possible to teach real numbers before even rigorously defining them?
It is possible to teach real numbers in elementary school before even rigorously defining them by using what H. Wu ("The Mis-Education of Mathematics Teachers," Notices of the AMS, vol. 58, no. 3, p. ...
- 10.2k
24
votes
Fourier Animation
Wikipedia always has some great animations, often by User:LucasVB or User:Cmglee.
A few Fourier transform–related ones:
Approximating a square wave with a Fourier transform
(more of these for other ...
- 341
23
votes
Accepted
Should an undergraduate math program contain a course on Lebesgue integration?
I think the existing answers understate how much a standard American math major does not see the Lebesgue integral.
I'm going to poke around at a variety of college websites to see how they cover this ...
- 4,312
22
votes
Accepted
When did US mathematics programs start failing to prepare incoming students for books like "Baby" Rudin?
Opinion.
There never was a generation of high school students in the US who could jump right into Rudin.
There would be (and still is) a small portion of the top high school graduates who could. ...
- 6,211
21
votes
How would you explain what a PDE is to a very educated layman with no math background?
I would say something like this: "Often in complicated systems one needs to study multiple quantities, each of which varies at rates that depend on the other quantities and on how fast they are ...
- 16.3k
19
votes
Why would you teach Calculus before teaching Real Analysis?
Because your core assumption is bad and most students are not aspiring mathematicians
Your opening statement - "Let's assume our students are actual aspiring mathematicians" - is almost certainly a ...
- 330
19
votes
Complex numbers in high school
Although there is a tradition in the U.S. of nominal mention of complex numbers in the high school curriculum, in my observation it is invariably superficial, and complex numbers are not mentioned ...
- 13.5k
18
votes
Why would you teach Calculus before teaching Real Analysis?
In addition to other good answers, I do think that what "calculus" usually refers to is what people did with calculus prior to about 1830, as opposed to the foundations of it. Namely, they solved a ...
- 13.5k
17
votes
Accepted
Are the following topics usually in an introductory Complex Analysis class: Julia sets, Fatou sets, Mandelbrot set, etc?
No, these topics are not usually included in courses on complex analysis, for several reasons, which I will explain below. At the same time, it is easier to understand why relatively old textbooks did ...
- 13.5k
16
votes
Complex numbers in high school
In the United States, complex numbers are a standard part of the typical high school Algebra 2 course. Students (normally in grades 10 or 11, corresponding approximately to ages 15-17) learn to add, ...
- 16.3k
16
votes
Why is it possible to teach real numbers before even rigorously defining them?
But as far as real numbers were concerned, they were taught very early
without any clear definition was even given.
Were they?
I would say that usually no teacher really speaks of real numbers to ...
- 559
14
votes
How can I convince my brightest student of Cantor's theory?
Not every property is preserved by limits.
Here is a more basic situation in which the same reasoning is used:
For each natural number $n$, there are only finitely many natural numbers in the ...
- 19.5k
14
votes
Why is it possible to teach real numbers before even rigorously defining them?
At German universities, one of the first lectures in mathematics is "Analysis 1" which is a kind of "rigorous calculus" and there one always proceeds more or less like this:
We start with an ...
- 2,932
14
votes
Should an undergraduate math program contain a course on Lebesgue integration?
Is it standard for a math undergraduate program to have a course on Lebesgue integration?
No (assuming that "have a course" means "require people to take such a course in order to get ...
- 141
13
votes
Are the following topics usually in an introductory Complex Analysis class: Julia sets, Fatou sets, Mandelbrot set, etc?
A brief stab at an answer before someone more knowledgeable comes along: My brief experience says that: no, fractal sets are not usually a topic in complex analysis (they're not in any of the 3 ...
- 20.9k
12
votes
Reasons for (not) distinguishing $f$ from $f(x)$
The reasons for not distinguishing $f$ from $f(x)$ are historical.
For roughly 250 years, from the first use of the word "function" in mathematics (by Leibniz ~1680) until ~1930, the ...
- 1,614
12
votes
Advanced Calculus vs. Analysis for a first proof-based course
This is somewhat of a hypothesis rather than a definitive answer, but one reason why vector calculus may no longer be the first proof based course at many colleges is because vector calculus involves ...
- 1,035
11
votes
Evaluating the reception of (epsilon, delta) definitions
The apparent conflict between points of view expressed in the OP is illusory. There is no real conflict. The mathematics education researcher quoted in the OP is arguing that students find the ...
- 1,898
11
votes
Accepted
How can I motivate the formal definition of continuity?
Have a look at the paper written by Nunez et all:
EMBODIED COGNITION AS GROUNDING FOR SITUATEDNESS AND CONTEXT IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION.
In essence, they argue that it is better to be causious if ...
11
votes
Accepted
Why should we study continuity?
Most functions that are studied by physicists and other scientists are continuous. However, more and more discontinuous functions are appearing in the various sciences. This is due to:
Computers and ...
- 2,496
11
votes
Why do we study Cantor Set?
in beginning real analysis: to counter the naive notion that a "closed set" is a union of closed intervals, plus a few single points.
In beginning Lebesgue measure: the easiest example of an ...
- 6,211
10
votes
Why would you teach Calculus before teaching Real Analysis?
In many respects this is what is done in European universities, where the degree is often a three year program. First year students reading maths take analysis. Of course they probably learned ...
- 7,585
10
votes
Why do we study ordinary differential equations?
ODEs are used in many models to determine how the state of this model is changing (regarding time or another variable).
[…]
Am I missing another application […]?
This may be somewhat pedantic, but I ...
- 2,366
9
votes
Introducing the Lebesgue integral before Riemann's
In the US, you'd be hard-pressed to find any student seeing the Lebesgue integral before having ever seen the Riemann integral. Every calculus book I've seen defines the integral as the Riemann ...
- 2,916
9
votes
Evaluating the reception of (epsilon, delta) definitions
The essence of your question is why do mathematicians and math educators come to different conclusions about teaching the epsilon-delta definition. May I submit that we have different primary ...
- 10k
9
votes
What is the motivation for characterizing second order linear PDEs as hyperbolic, elliptic, or parabolic?
Benjamin Dickman already linked to my answer on Math.SE, but I didn't talk too much about exactly the motivation of the characterisation for second order equations. So let me write a little bit about ...
- 2,671
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible