Timeline for Is induction or recursion easier to understand?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2017 at 18:05 | comment | added | Daniel R. Collins | I guess I'm talking about exercises with conditionals like making truth tables, Venn diagrams, and identifying valid arguments involving a P -> Q statement. | |
| Jun 9, 2017 at 16:21 | comment | added | shoover | @BenI. I suspect he's talking about logic, logical operations, and proofs of the sort like "Given that P implies ~Q, prove that ... ". | |
| Jun 9, 2017 at 16:10 | comment | added | Ben I. | @DanielR.Collins I don't understand. Can you break that down a little more for me? | |
| Jun 9, 2017 at 16:05 | comment | added | Daniel R. Collins | "I have not been able to figure out why." My stock opinion on this is that students have usually never been taught proving conditionals in the first place. The fact that they're trying to pick that up midstream as one part of the inductive proof is the mystery part. | |
| Jun 9, 2017 at 11:08 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | "the size of a directory": Nice example! | |
| Jun 9, 2017 at 11:03 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 9, 2017 at 12:48 | |||||
| Jun 9, 2017 at 10:53 | history | answered | Ben I. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |