Timeline for Source for analysis of identification of structures in learner's mind and mathematical structures?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2017 at 15:48 | history | edited | Mikhail Katz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 65 characters in body
|
| Jun 26, 2017 at 17:37 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | I notice that the author of the article you linked writes "Piaget's theory has been influential in curriculum design, with scores of books and papers addressing the application of his theory to education (e.g., Elkind, 1976; Furth, 1970; Furth & Wachs, 1975; Jardine, 2006). " Do any of these challenge Piaget's assumption concerning "structures" that I outlined? | |
| Jun 26, 2017 at 12:21 | comment | added | Mikhail Katz | Hi guest, what I find particularly interesting about this critic's comments on Piaget is the evidence he provides that Bourbaki-inspired concepts like sets (not that "emsemble" is "set" in French) may not only not be helpful but may actually be detrimental in attempts to analyze the learner's mind and acquisition of knowledge. I was hoping to find some even more specific criticism of the connection implied by Piaget between structures in the learner's mind and "structures" a la Bourbaki. | |
| Jun 26, 2017 at 3:29 | comment | added | Chris Cunningham | +1, but this answer would be improved if it did not also tell the questioner to google the question, and have meta-commentary on the vote score of the post itself, I think. I hope you will make an account at some point so you can receive and discuss comments like this. Thanks for the answer! | |
| Jun 25, 2017 at 19:04 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 26, 2017 at 3:30 | |||||
| Jun 25, 2017 at 19:03 | history | answered | guest | CC BY-SA 3.0 |