Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 19, 2015 at 23:56 comment added Vandermonde ... If you believe in luck being an inherent quality of a player (and I do know some nearly consistent winners over quite a long term) or in lack of true randomness, the model assumed here no longer applies.
Nov 19, 2015 at 23:56 comment added Vandermonde @hildred: Well, she is onto the intuition that in order to conclude anything about probabilities or optimal strategy, you need assumptions about probabilities -- one cannot get something for nothing (in reasoning deductively, all of the content of any conclusions you make is already contained in your hypotheses) -- and those assumptions can well be wrong, resulting in garbage-in/garbage-out, TANSTAAFL, whatever you like to call it....
Jun 20, 2014 at 13:35 vote accept Tutor
Jun 18, 2014 at 17:04 comment added Ryan Reich @hildred That is totally hilarious! Did you point out that, whatever you think the reason is, you might have been tricked?
Jun 18, 2014 at 16:56 comment added hildred When I tried to explain the Monty Hall problem to may Grandpa's CNA, she insisted you should always hold because there was a reason you picked it in the first place. I was unable to successfully counter this belief.
Jun 17, 2014 at 4:05 comment added Ryan Reich @Tutor It was timely when it was written :)
Jun 17, 2014 at 2:30 comment added Tutor "This question shouldn't be about "all methods to explain Monty Hall" anyway" .....too late :(
Jun 15, 2014 at 13:53 comment added Tutor True....but it's still a good method when the other party is not too proud to look at things a different way
Jun 15, 2014 at 13:33 comment added Tutor Think I should put "my" method in as an answer of its own? [not really my own...it belongs to whoever explained it to me properly (though not first -- whoever that was did not do a good job;)]
Jun 15, 2014 at 5:33 history answered Ryan Reich CC BY-SA 3.0