Timeline for Geometrical verifications for Algebraic formulae
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 5, 2023 at 17:23 | comment | added | Will R | @JanakaRodrigo: Tell them the truth? "That was back in the olden days. Back then, most people didn't like negative numbers. But over time, people got used to the ideas, and nowadays we understand that it's actually very helpful to think in this way." Though to be completely honest I doubt most people care what Al-Khuwarizmi thought. You might be better off being enthusiastic about how cool and interesting it is that the same method works in a seemingly different situation, revealing that actually, the situation is not so different after all. | |
Sep 28, 2023 at 9:49 | comment | added | Janaka Rodrigo | If negative sides can be acceptable , what would you suggest as the reason for not considering negative coefficients in Al-Khuwarizmi approach? Is it not much sensible to rearrange the equation as shown in the extension of my clarification ? | |
Sep 28, 2023 at 0:21 | history | answered | Thierry | CC BY-SA 4.0 |