Skip to main content

Timeline for Unique candidate that fails

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

32 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 31 at 16:06 answer added Chris Cunningham timeline score: 4
Jan 1 at 3:02 answer added ac15 timeline score: 0
Jan 16, 2023 at 4:34 comment added user18187 Related to extraneous solutions
Jul 26, 2022 at 0:31 comment added paul garrett In my opinion/experience, the amazing thing is that human beings' mathematical concepts are nearly correct. I presume from physical experience.
Mar 6, 2021 at 16:06 answer added ryang timeline score: 8
Jan 4, 2021 at 15:06 comment added user10552 @Steven Gubkin: Sure. I’m referring to the way that Tom Apostol develops the logarithm in his Calculus textbook. Namely, he first defines the properties of a logarithm function, then shows that ‘if there is such a thing, it is this one’, and then, separately, afterwards, shows that ‘this thing works’. The first step involves only simple differentiation and integration, whereas the second step involves invoking the Substitution Theorem for Integrals, which makes it ‘harder’.
Jan 4, 2021 at 0:03 comment added Steven Gubkin @EulerSpoiler could you flesh out your comment a little bit? Some take the integral as the definition of the logarithm, so I am not sure what you mean by existence and uniqueness in this context?
Jan 3, 2021 at 22:59 comment added user10552 Note that your question is a special case of the question “When is proof of existence more difficult than proof of uniqueness?”, namely, when the difficulty of the proof of existence is infinite. An example of the non-infinite case is the derivation of the integral representation of the logarithm.
Jul 13, 2020 at 11:51 comment added David This probably doesn't count but if you have a system of four equations with three variables, the first three giving you a unique solution and the fourth one disqualifying it, you hvae an example of a unique candidate that doesn't work
May 4, 2020 at 20:34 answer added Dag Oskar Madsen timeline score: 6
Dec 24, 2019 at 21:02 comment added Bill Dubuque (Pedagogically) related Unique steps leading to a non-unique answer
Sep 8, 2019 at 16:56 answer added educator timeline score: -1
Mar 17, 2019 at 1:17 answer added Vandermonde timeline score: 2
Dec 31, 2017 at 2:51 vote accept Steven Gubkin
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:50 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://matheducators.stackexchange.com/ with https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/
Oct 24, 2015 at 6:58 answer added Vandermonde timeline score: 4
Mar 31, 2015 at 19:49 answer added albert timeline score: 6
Mar 31, 2015 at 9:54 answer added H.Durham timeline score: 18
Mar 31, 2015 at 1:19 answer added Scott Farrar timeline score: 8
Mar 30, 2015 at 23:11 answer added KCd timeline score: 22
Feb 22, 2015 at 15:18 answer added Gerald Edgar timeline score: 31
Oct 2, 2014 at 2:20 answer added David Z timeline score: 36
Sep 21, 2014 at 16:24 answer added Dag Oskar Madsen timeline score: 65
Sep 11, 2014 at 14:08 answer added paul garrett timeline score: 10
Sep 8, 2014 at 16:48 answer added user52817 timeline score: 2
Sep 8, 2014 at 1:00 comment added R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE I'm making this a comment rather than an answer in hopes that someone else will fill in some specific examples, but differential equations (ODE or PDE) and Fourier analysis would be some nice sources for this kind of example. You have a lot of situations where there's a natural "candidate function" but it fails to "exist" or to be in the space your operators are acting on.
Sep 7, 2014 at 13:50 answer added Ilmari Karonen timeline score: 117
Sep 7, 2014 at 12:06 answer added David E Speyer timeline score: 41
Sep 6, 2014 at 20:02 history edited Steven Gubkin CC BY-SA 3.0
changed title for more precision
Sep 6, 2014 at 10:08 answer added quid timeline score: 92
Sep 6, 2014 at 7:24 answer added JRN timeline score: 8
Sep 6, 2014 at 1:54 history asked Steven Gubkin CC BY-SA 3.0