Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with multiplication-table
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 64
1
vote
Arguments against multiplication by 'stacking'
I've never heard of 'stacking', the method shown appears the standard way to multiply digit by digit.
37 squared. For those who wish to do this in their head, I'd go up to 40, and the same 3 down to …
12
votes
What are the arguments for and against learning the multiplication table by heart?
As I tutor students and watch those with proficiency in up to 10x10, there's a clear difference in their ability to get through the problems in a timely manner.
It's a distraction to use a calculator …