5
$\begingroup$

I want to present these three descriptions of a parabolic curve to my precalculus class:

  1. The graph of a quadratic function $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$.

  2. Given a line called the directrix and a point called the focus, the set of all points in the plane that are equidistant to the directrix and focus.

  3. The intersection of a cone with a plane that is parallel to a tangent-plane to the cone.

Showing students that the first and second descriptions actually give us the same curve isn't too bad: just draw a focus and directrix in the plane, take an arbitrary point that is equidistant to them, and show that the $y$-coordinate is quadratic in the $x$-coordinate.

But showing that these first two descriptions are the same as the third seems quite a bit harder. Does anyone know an intuitive way to show that the conic section description of a parabola gives us the same curve as the other two descriptions? I really want something brief but satisfying (so not necessarily thorough) so that my students don't just tune out. But every method I've seen so far has been a bit too involved to present to a precalculus class (like here), and I don't see an easy way to prune out some details of these methods.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ have you tried to find any animations or videos that can help to visualize what is going on with the conic? I have found that for issues like this a quick 20 second animation can take the place of a 30 minute lesson. $\endgroup$
    – celeriko
    Commented Dec 20, 2016 at 18:52
  • $\begingroup$ @celeriko No I haven't. That might be a good idea. I'm worried that a video would be too long of an explanation in my particular case though (I'm a TA doing an additional lecture section, and I usually have to pack the class with material). And I shouldn't ask them to watch a video for homework; none of them will. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2016 at 19:11
  • $\begingroup$ understood, however does not need to be a long video, you can definitely find really nice videos/animations that are less than 5 minutes in length. Might be worth a shot, I totally get having to pack in too much material for the time period though, its tough. $\endgroup$
    – celeriko
    Commented Dec 20, 2016 at 19:41

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

This 5-minute video from Creative Learning is effective: Conic Section 3D Animation.


                   
But it might be too long (one of your worries). In which case, I would use the Wolfram Demo Conic Sections: The Double Cone, in which you interactively manipulate the plane and rotate the image in 3D, and can spend as little or as much time as you'd like:
      ConeDemo


$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ The video explains the conic-section definition of a parabola, but doesn't explain how it's gives the same curve as the other two descriptions. It's clearly gives us a "U-shaped" curve, but how do we know it's the same U-shaped curve as the graph of a quadratic polynomial? I keep looking at this explanation, but I'm not sure how to present that to my class in a less complicated way. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2016 at 20:21
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MikePierce: Good point. If you don't want to derive it in detail, perhaps just this high-level view suffices: The implicit equation of a cone in 3D, in terms of $x,y,z$ is quadratic in those three variables. Intersecting with a plane leaves an implicit quadratic equation in $x,y,z$. Quadratic equations lead to parabolas, ellipses, hyperbolas. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2016 at 20:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I like that idea. Maybe write down the equation of the double-cone in $3$-space, convince them that the equation does correspond to that cone, and then write down the equation of a "tilted cone" (which I think they'll just accept) so the plane we intersect with we can just think of the $x,y$-plane. Then just notice that if we let $z = 0$ the result is a quadratic. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2016 at 20:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MikePierce: Yes. The 3D cone is $x^2 + y^2 = (r/h)^2 z^2$ under certain assumptions ($r/h$ radius/height ratio, apex @origin). Nice idea to tilt. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2016 at 21:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.